Missouri vs Biden: A Win For Science

In the Missouri vs. Biden case held a little over a month ago, Dr. Jay Bhattacharya was a witness against the Biden Whitehouse. This historical case saw Dr. Bhattacharya witness what the Supreme Court in 1949 said was “the vitality of civil and political institutions: free discussions… free debate.”  According to Dr. Bhattacharya and as a point of fact, “the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that COVID-19 pandemic policy critics weren’t imagining these [censorship] violations. The Biden administration did indeed strong-arm social media companies into doing its bidding. The court found that the Biden White House, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the U.S. surgeon general’s office, and the FBI have “engaged in a years-long pressure campaign [on social media outlets] designed to ensure that the censorsohip aligned with the government’s preferred viewpoints.”

What was dismissed by the media and government as conspiracy theory was in truth a conspiracy.  The shocking aspect of this common story is not the collusion between government and powerful entities/corporations.  The shocker is that so many people fell for the media’s trickery in describing it.  If someone dared to question the government (and thus media) sanctioned version of events, that individual was labeled with the shameful words ‘conspiracy theorist.’  And what followed these diseased, simple minded science deniers was ex-communication from the church of right think.  A single day in court has come with much vindication, but as usual little “free press” coverage, no accountability, and absolutely no apology.  Worst of all, a lack of interest which breeds forgetfulness and in turn a repeat of history.